Showing posts with label Myspace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Myspace. Show all posts

The End of an Era?

Insider technology news - with its detailed web-trend tracking and analysis - can be responsible for somewhat misleading predictions about fundamental changes in the very fabric of Internet space and time, such as the designation of Web 2.0 and the social web as "new eras" in communication. Such grandiose terminology suggests a drastic break with the past, rather than emphasizing continuity or overlap in the shape or form of new media and related trends. At the same time, however, insider tech blogs are great venues for putting new web start-ups into perspective, at times paradoxically free of the idealism inherent in both popular media (Twitter, case in point, ad nauseam), and social research.

In the end, the so-called "social web", web-of-the-people, etc., is still subject to industry swings and financial roundabouts, which inevitably outweigh both permanence and innovation in equal measure. User-generated content and social networking are popular buzz words that highlight egocentricity in every day Internet use, thus enticing swarms of anthropologists, but user behavior is only one side of the Web 2.0 coin. I venture to say that changes in techie reality happen at a pace much faster than those in the social sciences, and, as we try to get a handle on new media as they blow up, the industry has moved on. For instance, while MySpace has become a prolific stomping ground for Internet anthropologists, the techies seem ready to wipe their hands and turn up their noses: "Like an ’80s rock band, MySpace’s time has come and gone" (see below) and "MySpace is dead - the Internet is growing up" (RWW).

For anthropologists, new media is about socialization, communication, bonding, age-relative culture or sub-cultures, networking and interpersonal relationships. For insiders, the social web is a marketplace. The new prediction therein is that the only market left for massive social networking sites is divided into niches or designated corners in which they can sustain a profit:
"Folks, what we are seeing is an end of general purpose, broad social networking. Finally, after nearly two years of us saying so, social is now simply part of the web fabric".
The funny thing is, anthropologists came to the same conclusion, but by mostly different means ... and over a decade ago.


Full article from GigaOM:

With MySpace Changes, a Social Networking Era Ends

The legendary New York Yankees catcher Yogi Berra is rumored to have said about a restaurant: “Nobody goes there anymore because it’s too crowded.” That is precisely how I feel about MySpace, which apparently has a lot of visitors, especially in the U.S., where it is marginally ahead of Facebook, but no one I know actually uses it.

Things are only going to get tougher — Google’s deal with News Corp is going to end soon, and with it a steady spigot of cash will be turned off for a service that is struggling to grow revenues. Like an ’80s rock band, MySpace’s time has come and gone. And nothing reflects that more than the exits of MySpace CEO Chris DeWolfe and his long-time cohort, President Tom Anderson. DeWolfe ran the company from 2003, helped sell it to News Corp for $580 million in 2005 and later helped negotiate a $900 million advertising deal with Google. Since then, MySpace has lost its buzz to Facebook (which is in turn losing that buzz to Twitter). It attempted to become an app platform, but that hasn’t worked out as well. Being a media entrepreneur, I have religiously studied Rupert Murdoch’s career. At the first sign of diminishing returns, Murdoch puts a media entity up for sale, and tries to swap his tin mine for one producing gold. He tried to do that when he attempted to pawn off MySpace to Yahoo.

The clock has been ticking on MySpace and its executives. Earlier this year, COO Amit Kapur and two other long-time MySpace employees left the company because they couldn’t get the contracts they wanted. Their exit was spun by News Corp. After reading various accounts of DeWolfe’s exit, you can see they left Chris out to dry — something I find particularly distasteful.

Regardless of his exit, there is a strategy in place that could turn MySpace into a decent enough money maker: MySpace Music. By looking to social network’s musical roots, MySpace executives realized that they could build the MTV of the broadband generation. Combining text, audio, video, and social abilities with its audience, MySpace can thrive as a niche yet lucrative musical destination. A lot has to go right for that to happen, though. I have outlined a long list of reservations about MySpace Music.

Back in November 2008, Kevin Kelleher noted, “Social networks spent too much time trying to build audiences without building a solid business model.” With a recession raging and the advertising market in a slump, the social networks have to figure out business models — fast. For MySpace it could mean capturing music industry dollars. MySpace wouldn’t be the first social network looking for niche riches. Hi5, a San Francisco-based social network that’s popular outside of the U.S., recently cut half of its workforce and is said to be pivoting into becoming a social gaming destination. Others are going to soon follow. Folks, what we are seeing is an end of general purpose, broad social networking.

Finally, after nearly two years of us saying so, social is now simply part of the web fabric. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg recognized that and since then has been pushing hard on Facebook Connect, which is a simple authentication method that also allows granular social interactions to be embedded in non-Facebook services. With over 200 million Facebookers, Mark has somewhat of a future.

DeWolfe should take this unceremonious exit as a blessing in disguise. Or as Yogi would say, “It gets late early around here…”

[emphasis added]

[Edit: Yet another end of an era ...]

Coca-Cola sets up mobile social network

Coca-Cola Co. is creating a virtual teenager hangout like MySpace and Facebook, only on cell phones, to lure more youngsters to its sodas and flavored drinks, starting in the United States and China. Eyeing the success of mostly desktop computer-bound teen social sites run by media companies, like News Corp's MySpace, the world biggest soft drink maker said on Wednesday it was creating a cell-phone network under its Sprite brand where members can set up profiles, post pictures and meet new friends.

Coke, part of a growing group of advertisers putting ad campaigns on cell phones, will make the U.S. site available to Web-ready phones on June 22. It launched in China last week and is eyeing other markets in regions like Latin America.

"The Coca-Cola Company needs to continue to recruit future generations of consumers," said Mark Greatrex, senior vice president of marketing for Coca-Cola. "Mobile marketing is absolutely where it's at for us going forward." [more]


. Digg!
Add to del.icio.us

Conflicting views on Web 2.0

Back in 2006 [source], the impact of Web 2.0 on surfing behavior was already being debated.

"Web 2.0 sites have often been dismissed as just a passing fad but a recent survey by Comcast shows user-generated content to be a real money spinner. Web sites using Web 2.0 methods and user-generated content (UGC) are proving to be some of the most successful and fastest growing websites in the UK. Digital media measurement company comScore World Metrix has released an analysis of UK Internet users' activity from July 2005 to July 2006, and many of the leading sites are sites that feature mainly free, user-generated content.

.... "Web 2.0 is clearly architected for participation, as it attempts to harness the collective intelligence of Web users," commented Bob Ivins, managing director of comScore Europe. Many of the sites experiencing the fastest growth today are the ones that understand their audience's need for expression and have made it easy for them to share pictures, upload music and video, and provide their own commentary, thus stimulating others to do the same. It is the classic network effect at work."


More recently (a bit late?), The BBC [source] reported that the Web 2.0 "wave" is starting to take hold. This article suggests that Web 2.0 is allowing browsers to become more utilitarian, like the ancient artifacts of packaged computer programs, once purchased, boxed and shrink-wrapped, in shops that you visited in person.

"In a basic way it demonstrates how web browsers are gradually being used by consumers for far more than just looking around in cyberspace. As people gravitate to the internet for more and more free services and solutions the web browser could become the central window through which our daily lives are conducted, potentially replacing most desktop applications. Software giants like Microsoft and Adobe have been launching their own online applications, some of which resemble their well-known retail titles. Adobe has released a stripped-down web version of its video editing software, called Remix, and later this year plans to launch an internet version of its very successful photo manipulation program, Photoshop.


... I think they are genuinely trying to figure out how to make this work, because they know it's going to be a big part of their companies in 10 years. .... Docs and Spreadsheets is [sic] a product that most consumers could happily use instead of Microsoft Office, with multi-user, location free [sic] collaboration being an added benefit. .... One incentive for companies to supply online software is compatibility. In one go, all customers can be upgraded to the newest version and create files that are universally compatible, unlike different generations of Word documents. "So the companies really like it, and it's to the companies' advantage for the software to work extremely well and for you to use it all the time because then they get more information and then they can sell you more stuff." To older users of desktop applications, who are usually more cautious about their online activity, this might seem disconcerting, but for younger computer users, the MySpace generation who freely flaunt the details of their personal lives, it might be not be such a big deal.

I think this brings up some decent concerns along with the benefits of online programs. It is true that there is a great marketing potential for companies, and a greater usability potential for consumers, especially with compatibility issues. It is likely, however, that companies like Adobe and Microsoft will continue to offer only watered-down versions of their popular programs online. As for Google, I have to say that I perused their online word processing software some time ago, but chose to remain with my reliable Microsoft Word. I suppose I am one of the older (out-dated?) Internet users more weary of making insecure material which I would rather keep private.

The variable definition of Web 2.0 makes this post difficult. I attribute the label 'Web 2.0' to sites which run by UGC in that it involves some kind of community-based user interactivity. Using a word processor online wouldn't really constitute an aspect of Web 2.0 unless the documents were made public, possibly with tagging capability? I suppose that is the difficulty with labelling rapidly changing elements like the Internet. There is too much crossover for any terminology to stick around for too long.

At any rate, within a few days of the BBC post, I read an article which claims that Web 2.0 is failing to impress users.

A Report from Hitwise shows that only a tiny proportion of visitors to so-called Web 2.0 sites actually participate in the information sharing or user-generated content process. Web 2.0, the current internet buzz term for collaborative web sites that allow for some degree of user-generated content, is proving to be far less of a draw for web users than the hype suggests, a study has showed. A tiny 0.16 percent of visits to Google's top video-sharing site, YouTube, are by users seeking to upload video for others to watch, according to a study of online surfing data by Bill Tancer, an analyst with web audience measurement firm Hitwise. Similarly, only two-tenths of one per cent of visits to Flickr, the popular photo-gallery site owned by Yahoo, are to upload new photos, the Hitwise study found. The vast majority of visitors are the online equivalent of the television generation's couch potatoes - voyeurs who like to watch rather than create, Tancer's statistics show. [source]

But is this actually surprising? Well before the days of 'Web 2.0', how many Internet users made their own websites, and how many just visited other websites? Even more archaic an example, how many people write their own books and how many would visit a library to read one? I therefore think that the statistics presented in the article do not actually support that argument that Web 2.0 is failing to impress users.

Which leads to the question, how does one define a Web 2.0 user and in what way does that differ from an Internet user?

Digg!
Add to del.icio.us

Twitter ... seriously.

What exactly is happening here?

Do people actually want to know - or want others to know - where they are at any given time? "Answer on your phone, IM, or right here on the web!" What does this mean in relation to what we already know about social networking and the importance of physical proximity in human relationships? (I wonder if this will also justify the use of GPS tracking devices in consumer mobile phones.)

So, then, in answer to this simple question, "What are you doing"?, let's see what some people are doing as of 14.36 BST:


dsanchezbote Preparando el abstract para mandar al congreso de Moodle less than 5 seconds ago from web. (Thank you to this user for introducing me to Moodle)

sooyin Watching Heroes. Advert break! less than 5 seconds ago from web

yubbie Spring has sprung, the grass has riz, wonder where the birdies is? And my as is stuck inside. less than 5 seconds ago from im

bartknows The Twitter following feature is another channel of passive rejection. less than 10 seconds ago from web

pmuellr @sogrady Say hey to my boss-man, Paul Buck less than 10 seconds ago from web in reply to sogrady

RiesMeister Wants his windows fixed. Not the glass ones though... less than 10 seconds ago from web

tomharpel Seeing about flying home on Friday instead of Sunday. less than 10 seconds ago from web

aingeru Lanean berriz bazkaritik etorri ostean. less than 10 seconds ago from web

I don't really know what to conclude from this. Most posts are clearly more mundane than profound, but not in all cases. Can this be considered a form of socializing? There are links to friends and follow-ups, but it seems that a site like this takes more dedication than, say, Myspace. It's a bit like blogging in snippets. Still, Twitter does seem to be an appropriate name for it. I'm consistently impressed with the ever-increasing selection of social networking sites emerging daily. It seems clearer and clearer to me that trying to grasp the many varied ways in which Internet and mobile technologies are being used today is a daunting task - one which can have no end ... which is good. Isn't it?


Digg!
Add to del.icio.us

top